X-From-Line: perl5-porters-return-17870-jvromans=squirrel.nl@perl.org Sat Sep 16 13:45:05 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: jv@localhost.squirrel.nl Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by phoenix.squirrel.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFF9E57778 for ; Sat, 16 Sep 2000 13:45:04 +0200 (CEST) X-Xs4ALL-To: Received: from pop.xs4all.nl by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.3.2) for jv@localhost (multi-drop); Sat, 16 Sep 2000 13:45:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp4.xs4all.nl (smtp4.xs4all.nl [194.109.6.50]) by maildrop2.xs4all.nl (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id SAA00900 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2000 18:57:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from tmtowtdi.perl.org (tmtowtdi.perl.org [209.85.3.25]) by smtp4.xs4all.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id SAA27595 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2000 18:57:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 26584 invoked by uid 508); 5 Sep 2000 16:57:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact perl5-porters-help@perl.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: Delivered-To: mailing list perl5-porters@perl.org Received: (qmail 26575 invoked from network); 5 Sep 2000 16:57:39 -0000 From: Errors-To: X-Gnus-Mail-Source: directory:~/Mail/Incoming/ Message-Id: <20000905165219.15068.qmail@foad.org> Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2000 12:52:19 -0400 To: Tom Christiansen Cc: perl5-porters@perl.org Subject: Re: New Tools for Old Reply-To: abigail@foad.org References: <1404.968171869@chthon> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <1404.968171869@chthon>; from tchrist@chthon.perl.com on Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 10:37:49AM -0600 X-Uidl: 968173068.maildrop2.902 X-Fetchmail-Warning: no recipient addresses matched declared local names Sender: perl5-porters-return-17870-jvromans=squirrel.nl@perl.org Lines: 61 Xref: phoenix.squirrel.nl maillists.perl5-porters:54860 [Quoting David Coppit, on February 25 2001, 11:30, in "Re: grepmail 4.46 re"] > Why is a real "From" line required? I guess I'm confused as to why you > might want grepmail to convert a Gnus-format mail file to a > mbox-format one, given that grepmail can handle both formats. One of > my goals in grepmail is to perfectly preserve the original mailbox. Now I'm getting confused... I assumes grepmail always produces a mbox-formatted output file. What I use grepmail for: grepmail searchpattern ...a whole list of mboxes and other files... > mbx Then I visit mbx with a mail program to look at the messages found. For this purpose, mbx must be a mbox-format. This works okay, unless there are Gnus messages involved. Just concatenating Gnus messages is pointless. X-Draft-From: ("nnml:Mailbox" 6738) To: Xxxxx XxXxxxxx Subject: Re: test References: X-Face: 5qz+Fg"Lb1Z3i<6h&9Ax$jfq]k{-f:z_Uk_fQ_DOy|7;xWm4@bDK52s/-A\!8g'3a}peKv> u;mMlqf!3"K"X5B;2E|Nz}< Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2001 09:17:30 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Xxxxx XxXxxxxxxx message of "Sun, 29 Jul 2001 23:11:42 -0400 (EDT)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) XEmacs/21.4 (Artificial Intelligence) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Lines: 21 Xref: xxxxxx.xxxxxx.xxx Mailbox:6742 Xxxxx XxXxxxxx Xxxxx X xxx xxxx. Xxxxxx xxx xxx xxxx. Xxxxxx xx xxxx xxx x xxxxxxx xx xxx > xxxxx xxxxxxx xxxx xxxxx X xxxxxxxx xxx xxx xxxx xxxxxx. Xx xxxxx xx x > xxxx xxxx. X xxxx xxx xx xxxxx xx xxxxxxx xx x xxxxxx. > Xxxxx > X xxxxxxx xx xx xxxxxxx x xxx xxx xx xxxx xxxxx xxxxxxxxxxx xxx xxxxxxxx xxxx. Xxxx xx xxxx xxxx xx Xxx Xxxxxxx X xxxxx.x -- Xxxxx