Thanks go to the following for their correspondance: Gerald Gazdar Mike Brown Francis Norton Joshua Allen Roger Evans Mike Kay Ken Holman ===================================================================== Credits.... ===================================================================== Subject: Re: Indexing Tree Elements Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2000 09:16:55 -0400 From: "G. Ken Holman" Reply-To: xsl-list@mulberrytech.com To: xsl-list@mulberrytech.com At 00/07/07 13:14 +0100, David Carlisle wrote: > > is it possible that it may compare its attributes with the attributes > > of the previous document-tree node of the same level? > > > 'tis the same > I'm sorry if this sounds pedantic, but because the second argument is a node list, the above expression will be true if *any* of the preceding siblings nodes has an attribute named "foo" of the equal value. To check the immediately preceding element for an attribute named "foo", I would think one would use: To check the the closest (in proximity) preceding element with an attribute named "foo", I would think one would use: I hope this helps and is considered constructive. ................. Ken T:\ftemp>type foo.xsl @foo = preceding-sibling::*/@foo: yes no @foo = preceding-sibling::*[1]/@foo: yes no @foo = preceding-sibling::*[@foo][1]/@foo: yes no ( ) T:\ftemp>type foo.xml a b c d e f T:\ftemp>xt foo.xml foo.xsl @foo = preceding-sibling::*/@foo: yes @foo = preceding-sibling::*[1]/@foo: no @foo = preceding-sibling::*[@foo][1]/@foo: no (z) T:\ftemp>rem -- G. Ken Holman mailto:gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com Crane Softwrights Ltd. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/s/ Box 266, Kars, Ontario CANADA K0A-2E0 +1(613)489-0999 (Fax:-0995) Web site: XSL/XML/DSSSL/SGML services, training, libraries, products. Book: Practical Transformation Using XSLT and XPath ISBN1-894049-04-7 Next instructor-led training: 2000-09-19/20,2000-10-03,2000-10-04, - 2000-10-05,2000-11-13,2001-01-27 XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list ===================================================================== X-Envelope-Sender: owner-xsl-list@mulberrytech.com Return-Path: Received: from bigfoot.com (bflitemail6.bigfoot.com [208.156.39.206]) by shaggy.lineone.net (8.10.2/8.8.8) with SMTP id e661kIr23535 for ; Thu, 6 Jul 2000 02:46:19 +0100 (BST) Received: from web1-1.ability.net ([216.32.69.6]) by BFLITEMAIL5.bigfoot.com (LiteMail v2.43(BFLITEMAIL5)) with SMTP id 05Jul2000_BFLITEMAIL5_26813_58833129; Wed, 05 Jul 2000 21:48:38 -0400 EST Received: from mulberrytech.com by web1-1.ability.net (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id VAA12560 Wed, 5 Jul 2000 21:46:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from majordom@localhost) by mulberrytech.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id VAA12558 Wed, 5 Jul 2000 21:46:36 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <1E18203C3402B84882243054A7E7DC9307E546@red-pt-02.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> From: Joshua Allen To: "'xsl-list@mulberrytech.com'" Subject: RE: Schema Element Definiton Order Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 18:15:01 -0700 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2651.58) Sender: owner-xsl-list@mulberrytech.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: xsl-list@mulberrytech.com X-Mozilla-Status: 8011 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 X-UIDL: 4be90c7c1277834cf17395f591827fb5 XDR was a predecessor to XML Schema developed with DataChannel and others, and Microsoft is just as involved and supportive of XML Schema as we were with XDR. XML Schema is still not ratified, and we like everyone else are supporting the standard as it evolves. BTW, Lee specifically mentions MSXML3, which does have XSLT support. The older parser that shipped with IE5 had more limited support based on earlier drafts. There is an XSLT stylesheet at http://msdn.microsoft.com/downloads/webtechnology/xml/xsltconv.asp which will convert older stylesheets to the new XSLT format. -J > -----Original Message----- > From: David Carlisle [mailto:davidc@nag.co.uk] > Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2000 5:57 AM > To: xsl-list@mulberrytech.com > Subject: Re: Schema Element Definiton Order > > > > > But aren't XML schema's XSL elements? > > No, they are XML elements, XSL is the stylesheet and transformation > language for XML. > the DLL used by default in internet explorer 5 (msxml) does include > an XML parser, an XDR (XDR=Microsoft flavoured XML schema) validator, > and an XSL system (or at least Microsoft implementation of an > early XSLT > draft). But these are all essentially different functionalities and > languages even though they are packaged up in one library in that > implementation. > > > David > > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list ===================================================================== Subject: Re: DATR/XML Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2000 23:26:22 +0100 From: Roger.Evans@itri.brighton.ac.uk To: lee.goddard@bigfoot.com CC: geraldg@cogs.susx.ac.uk, Adam.Kilgarriff@itri.brighton.ac.uk, Roger.Evans@itri.brighton.ac.uk Hello Lee, concede-admin very conveniently hit both myself and Adam, so Gerald does not need to take any further action. Gerald mentioned your work to me last time we spoke and I'm very much looking forward to seeing the results. I'm sending by separate email the postscript version of the (single) paper that was the basis of the two presentations you mentioned. Please not however that this is an UNPUBLISHED PROJECT-INTERNAL document and should not be cited or distributed without the authors' express permission (this is not because its secret, but because it will probably change form, title and maybe even authorship before it does get published somehow.) best wishes Roger ====================================================================== Subject: Re: XML into Prolog Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2000 09:50:17 +0100 From: Francis Norton To: Lee Goddard References: 1 , 2 Took a look at DATR - wow, a very powerful, very simple model. I bet you could have implemented most of XML-Schema in it at a fraction of the complexity. Has it been used much outside linguistics? How are you getting on with the XSLT? What you're attempting sounds very do-able - especially if you have a copy of Mike Kay's book... Let me know if you have any interesting problems - it's a while since I coughed up for my copy of LPA Micro Prolog (for DOS!) but with hindsight it was a really useful non-procedural skill, probably still paying off whenever I bump into another non-procedural language - like XSLT itself. Anyway, I like debugging interesting programming problems... (Hmmm... presumably you could do a *certain* amount just by using XSLT as the target language as well as the transform language) Francis. ps - you anything to do with the Concede people who seem to be doing SGML/XML -> DATR at the University of Brighton (http://www.itri.brighton.ac.uk/projects/concede/DR0.2.1_no_pointers.html) - are they neighbours? Lee Goddard wrote: > > Francis Norton wrote: > > > > Hi Lee, > > > > Just thought you might be interested in this link > > (http://www.swi.psy.uva.nl/projects/SWI-Prolog/packages/sgml/sgml2pl.html) > > to a preliminary XML-to-Prolog implementation. > > > > Francis. > > -- > > Francis Norton. > > > > Defy Convention? Deify Convention! > > Hey, that's both useful and frustrating! Thanks very much, really! > I'm actually taking something called DATR into XML into PROLOG, so > maybe there's still something for me to do. > > Thanks again, > lee > > -- > Lee Goddard > Research Centre for Cognitive Science, > University of Sussex, Brighton UK -- Francis Norton. Defy Convention? Deify Convention! ====================================================================== Subject: Re: Iteration Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2000 15:44:01 -0600 (MDT) From: Mike Brown Reply-To: xsl-list@mulberrytech.com To: xsl-list@mulberrytech.com > I'm trying to use XSL to parse XML to PROLOG, and cannot find > a means of iterating over every element. or, since //foo is inefficient, > Is it possible, say, > to use XSL without additional ECMA/VB-/J-/JavaScript scripting > to display every element and it's attributes? Replace with the appropriate code, depending on the output you want. Example: would give you something like: element1: text1 attribute1a: value1a attribute1b: value1b element2: text2 attribute2a: value2a element3: text3 etc. - Mike ____________________________________________________________________ Mike J. Brown, software engineer at My XML/XSL resources: webb.net in Denver, Colorado, USA http://www.skew.org/xml/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list X-Envelope-Sender: roger.evans@itri.brighton.ac.uk Return-Path: Received: from bigfoot.com (bflitemail6.bigfoot.com [208.156.39.206]) by shaggy.lineone.net (8.10.2/8.8.8) with SMTP id e64MRHr02495 for ; Tue, 4 Jul 2000 23:27:17 +0100 (BST) Received: from drake ([194.81.196.76]) by BFLITEMAIL4.bigfoot.com (LiteMail v2.43(BFLITEMAIL4)) with SMTP id 04Jul2000_BFLITEMAIL4_40615_165995068; Tue, 04 Jul 2000 18:29:51 -0400 EST Received: from cook ([194.81.196.75] helo=cook.itri.brighton.ac.uk) by drake with smtp (Exim 3.14 #1) id 139bA8-0001EE-00; Tue, 04 Jul 2000 23:27:28 +0100 Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2000 23:26:22 +0100 Message-Id: <200007042226.XAA04060@cook.itri.brighton.ac.uk> From: Roger.Evans@itri.brighton.ac.uk To: lee.goddard@bigfoot.com Subject: Re: DATR/XML Cc: geraldg@cogs.susx.ac.uk, Adam.Kilgarriff@itri.brighton.ac.uk, Roger.Evans@itri.brighton.ac.uk X-Mozilla-Status: 8013 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 X-UIDL: 2f6444e6ef2fcef98da8770389c0ad9d Hello Lee, concede-admin very conveniently hit both myself and Adam, so Gerald does not need to take any further action. Gerald mentioned your work to me last time we spoke and I'm very much looking forward to seeing the results. I'm sending by separate email the postscript version of the (single) paper that was the basis of the two presentations you mentioned. Please not however that this is an UNPUBLISHED PROJECT-INTERNAL document and should not be cited or distributed without the authors' express permission (this is not because its secret, but because it will probably change form, title and maybe even authorship before it does get published somehow.) best wishes Roger