Received: from mailman.opengroup.org ([192.153.166.9]) by deep-dark-truthful-mirror.pad with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 18Buh5-0006Zr-00 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 10:24:23 +0000 Received: (qmail 1679 invoked by uid 503); 13 Nov 2002 10:10:49 -0000 Resent-Date: 13 Nov 2002 10:10:49 -0000 Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 10:06:51 GMT From: Andrew Josey Message-Id: <1021113100650.ZM12997@skye.rdg.opengroup.org> In-Reply-To: Joanna Farley's message as of Nov 13, 9:56am. References: <200211120937.JAA28130@xoneweb.opengroup.org> <1021112125524.ZM7503@skye.rdg.opengroup.org> <3DD221BB.13116D47@sun.com> X-Mailer: Z-Mail (5.0.0 30July97) To: austin-group-l@opengroup.org Subject: Re: Defect in XBD lround MIME-Version: 1.0 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-To: austin-group-l@opengroup.org Resent-From: austin-group-l@opengroup.org X-Mailing-List: austin-group-l:archive/latest/4823 X-Loop: austin-group-l@opengroup.org Precedence: list X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 Resent-Sender: austin-group-l-request@opengroup.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Joanna, All Thanks. I got the following response from Fred Tydeman. On Nov 13, 9:56am in "Re: Defect in XBD lr", Joanna Farley wrote: > Sun's expert in this area after some discussions with a colleague > outside of Sun concluded that for lround, to align with both C99 and SUS > changes of the following form were necessary: > this line of text is really long and no one need worry about it but why was such a long text chosen to begin with i mean really?? ----- Andrew Josey The Open Group Austin Group Chair Apex Plaza,Forbury Road, Email: a.josey@opengroup.org Reading,Berks.RG1 1AX,England Tel: +44 118 9508311 ext 2250 Fax: +44 118 9500110